2011 April 29th Friday
Answer to questioner O
< The question by O >
Sent: Sunday and April 24, 201,110: 05 PM
It does after a long time. It is vigorous?
1 months passed from earthquake disaster.
Gradually, you think as the timewise kana which is started verifying information.
If some point there are times when you think in doubt and can instruct you think.
If the one which appears in TV almost “under no millimeter sievert there is no influence in the human body”
With you say, it is “threshold value” theory, but at part there is also refutation.
Concerning this point, if you can teach even with the reference material what it is fortunate.
When also the reference material after, concerning bioconcentration it is, we ask may.
Furthermore (suddenly + the selfishness, it is the request, it is not. )
The teaching of JCO was not utilized this time somehow with the shank.
< Answer to interpellator O >
Very much the impoliteness, inscribing owner name once more, if sending, it is fortunate.
As for this, the blog regarding earthquake disaster unskillfulness while doing the work of making English,
You verified your own speech with the blog, in the middle of April.
Immediately after the earthquake circumstances and relief measure of suffering area were built with the magnificent scale.
Of course, government and the police, it is not the kind of standpoint where accurate information enters directly from the mass communications,
There was no either room which is corrected immediately in best step.
Recently it became, occurred with rescue activity and cooling measure, by comparison with actual trouble, in the considerable part of your own description
It is about response is felt. The Sendai inland, being information insufficient, we were worried, but
There to be worth of rescue and the police and extinguishment activity, many lives scooping,
The sufferer relief which is isolated on the other hand at the big city to be good to somewhere functioning having done?,
It is at the point where investigation waits.
Concerning bioconcentration, from time “of the spring of classic silence”,
Many scholars have established already, when it seems that does not have simple textbook level,
You try probably to be sufficient in the general book store and the dictionary.
In regard to the radioactive substance,
Satoru the Imanaka of Kyoto University reactor experimental place associate professor two (the Tetsu [ji] during now,
It handles also the Chernobyl-related literature, participates recently with media such as television,
If you can refer, you think.
The threshold you call the boundary whether or not there is an effect of, that threshold it probably is thing?
Prescribing those which with animal experiment is poisonous under identical conditions, there is individual difference,
You think that where numerical value of the extent concrete boundary where the data is many is required.
But, that Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, the abundant data was processed with three mile, assuming,
Condition differs from Fukushima after all, if it is difficult to declare that disease rate and mortality rate are high all right, or significantly, probably will be.
If, 10 years ahead this, the data is gathered honestly, in Japan, if in the latest accident about which being all right?,
“The literature” being similar, as for being able to point out you think that it is yet to come.
Government and the media, in regard to this,
While having known, it is not the case that it has never hidden,
“If to here responsibility cannot have safety declaration”.
It is the case that you say with that and cannot say.
Those where the spots it hits in the neutron and the radioactive substance are problem “of probability”,
If from in the vicinity, from long haul, compared to it takes in abundantly inside the lung and the mouth,
That much the spots the danger of hitting increases.
Comparing, if you say, whether russian roulette or the lottery it is the place where you said.
Low if everyday it takes in also the food of level, abundantly, it is equal to the food of little high level.
And, in Japan where this environmental pollution is already terrible,
Completely, having, there is no safe place, there is also the cause mortality rate being higher,
It escapes thoughtlessly and that it is thought how turning also.
Simply, as a human of the Osaka origin,
As for Osaka still it is better than as for Tokyo, but is not safer than Kyushu.
It is meaningless for the Kyushu person specially to evacuate to Osaka, but
If it is the Kanto area person, as for a little risk as for evacuation to Kansai area in regard to preparedness,
It believes that it is the expectation which can expect a some effect.
Osaka already is dangerous e.g., with, we would like to think as little as possible,
That the inhabitant of every metropolis and districts, probably is something which you think that you want just your own place being safe.
The one which does not appear in the outside is better, the person where the mineral water is good, attaches the mask is good,
It is the same correspondence as the time of the influenza, but non it is realistic also for 10 years to continue that.
Japanese nationwide everyone with intention of the sufferer, thing of the range where each one is possible
While compromising, the fact that the earnest have no other choice but to keeps doing, is not to be the populace, probably will be?
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿